Sadaharu: @Ivan Yeah so it will end up in a ko and it's kind of better for the opponent than the ko in the answer? S1T3 would be an interesting variation too.
TherapieGo: It's really kind of you to bring up the idea, but given my limited ability to express myself in English (I mostly use a translator), I’d rather not accept, whatever is decided about it ^^
If you don’t mind me continuing to help out as I currently do, that would be perfect for me :) One improvement that might be cool for the site would be to have a Discord someday? Or at least to be able to reply to each other in the same conversation thread here... I feel like the communication tools on the site aren’t very optimal. Maybe a simple suggestion space could be considered? P.S.: The fact that I can't even add line breaks in my messages here is a bit annoying too ^^
caranthir: 1) The current way generates (at least) double the amount of work (admin trying to understand your sequences, then editing the sequences in) 2) If you edited the sequences yourself, you'd probably be communicating less and not more 3) The current way has some chance of having less immediate mistakes (more eyes catching mistakes even before anything is edited), but I'm not sure if it's worth the additional time. Admins too already make occasional mistakes with their sequences but every mistake is always caught eventually. 4) Regardless of what I said in points 1-3, we are very thankful for your work anyway.
TwT: May you please ask Joschka to get admin privileg? I would leave to get you in. The dedication, time and effort you show is outstanding and far beyond the need of being confirmed by other admins.
TherapieGo: After a long search, I think the solution should be to take the Ko first. Also B19 and E19 lead to the solution. I put my SGF file above, you don't have to take into account everything I put in it, just leave it here if anyone is motivated to look carefully.
caranthir: Great work. I put in almost everything, except one subvariation where it was about alternative opponent refutation, leading to the same result.
This task is rich.