Tschej: Hi TwT.
My message was supposed to be an answer to Ivan Detkov's message. Im afraid, but I must notice that it did not appear as such. My inexperience on this site and, primarily, my limited brain capazity is at fault. I very kindly ask for a apology to a lower being like me. I yet have to understand if a useless exchange as A1C2 is reason enough to get a 'wrong' try. Maybe you can enlighten me if someone just deserves a 'wrong' try if they do such useless exchange as it has no use, or if it should be added to the tree as its practically not wrong, oh holy TwT. Once this is clarified, I myself would sacrifice myself and make an proposal. Some people, like you, are just smart. Others, me, have sometimes bad luck in the thinking proccess.
Ivan Detkov: Why should I explain? I am a sensei, and you should listen to what I said and try to copy me. I am just kidding. This eastern approach is not working for us. Let me explain. A1 is move, which is formally working in this particular position. I am against it because you gain absolutely nothing from A1. The response improves the position of your opponent by making it stronger. It is a good example of aji keshi, which means "bad taste". Players of all levels should avoid these moves at all costs. I cannot add it because I am disgusted. I recommend you train a disgust to such moves.
TwT: I will never eat my spinach.
Ivan Detkov is incredibly kind and demonstrates endless patience.
However, I kindly ask for a minimum of respect—please provide a SGF at the very least. Even better, consider making a proposal that allows both us and the site to benefit from your insights.
I apologize, but the following is one of my private, unsolvable riddles.
A teacher once said, 'If a book hits your head and produces a sound of emptiness, it must not be the book's fault.' Nowadays, if someone is lazy, clueless, or simply unaware, they often feel entitled to be seen—and unfortunately heard—and they blame it on the context.
I apologize for my rambling. If we ever meet in person, the drinks are on me.
Why should I explain? I am a sensei, and you should listen to what I said and try to copy me. I am just kidding. This eastern approach is not working for us. Let me explain. A1 is move, which is formally working in this particular position. I am against it because you gain absolutely nothing from A1. The response improves the position of your opponent by making it stronger. It is a good example of aji keshi, which means "bad taste". Players of all levels should avoid these moves at all costs. I cannot add it because I am disgusted. I recommend you train a disgust to such moves.